Ritual Communication and the Transmission of Local Knowledge in the Methik Pari Tradition: An Asiacentric Reading of Javanese Society

Amanda Putri Prasetya

Abstract


Communication studies often read local rituals through theories developed from Western experience. This article examines the methik pari tradition in Krakal Village, Wlingi District, Blitar Regency, as ritual communication sustained through the transmission of local knowledge. The study applies a non-positivistic qualitative approach. Primary data come from an in-depth interview with one elder and ritual specialist selected through purposive sampling. Secondary data come from journal articles, government documents, and local media. The analysis draws on Carey’s ritual view of communication and Miike’s Asiacentricity through four stages: data reduction, historical mapping, interpretation, and source triangulation. The findings show three points. First, ritual knowledge is transmitted orally through the family and direct practice. Second, the addressees of ritual communication are layered, including ancestors, Mbok Sri and Joko Sedono, the earth, and God. Third, agricultural modernization changes the rhythm of farming work but does not erase the ritual. The main challenge lies in the regeneration of ritual specialists. The article concludes that change in practice does not equal loss of meaning, and that Javanese experience can serve as a source of knowledge about communication.


Keywords


ritual communication; methik pari; knowledge transmission; Asiacentricity; Blitar

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carey, J. W. (2009). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society (Rev. ed.). Routledge.

Collier, W. L., Wiradi, G., & Soentoro. (1973). Recent changes in rice harvesting methods: Some serious social implications. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 9(2), 36–45.

Dissanayake, W. (2003). Asian approaches to human communication: Retrospect and prospect. Intercultural Communication Studies, 12(4), 17–37.

Kusalanana, S., Dewi, M. P., & Marjianto. (2020). Makna simbolik ritual selamatan methik pari dalam pandangan agama Buddha di Desa Gembongan Kecamatan Ponggok Kabupaten Blitar. Sabbhata Yatra: Jurnal Pariwisata dan Budaya, 1(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.53565/sabbhatayatra.v1i1.149

Melani, Z. F., & Sa’adillah, A. E. (2024). Spirituality and heritage of tradition: Exploring the rujakan pari tradition in Blitar Regency. Jurnal Studi Agama dan Masyarakat, 20(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.23971/jsam.v20i1.7757

Miike, Y. (2002). Theorizing culture and communication in the Asian context: An assumptive foundation. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11(1), 1–21.

Rinardi, H., Masruroh, N. N., Maulany, N. N., & Rochwulaningsih, Y. (2019). Dampak revolusi hijau dan modernisasi teknologi pertanian: Studi kasus pada budi daya pertanian bawang merah di Kabupaten Brebes. Jurnal Sejarah Citra Lekha, 4(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.14710/jscl.v4i2.21936

Sanah, B. F., & Hadi, N. (2021). Tradisi methik pari dalam bingkai realitas sosial-keagamaan masyarakat tani Dusun Ngadirejo Blitar. Jurnal Integrasi dan Harmoni Inovatif Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 1(4), 494–503. https://doi.org/10.17977/um063v1i4p494-503

Sujoko, A., Prianti, D. D., Wahyudi, D., & Surahman, M. A. (2023). Komunikasi perspektif Indonesia dan Asia. Universitas Brawijaya Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23941826

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Amanda Putri Prasetya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial

ISSN : 3025-6704