The Scope of Comparative Public Administration and the Objectives of Comparative Public Administration Studies

Sri Yulianty Mozin, Alexander H. Badjuka, Fatmawati Latif, Fardan Rumampuk, Mohamad Iqshal Botutihe

Abstract


This study examines Comparative Public Administration (SPAN) with a focus on the paradigm shift from a classical approach emphasizing bureaucratic structures to a contemporary, multidimensional, adaptive, and applicable paradigm. The study is significant for understanding cross-country administrative practices as a reference for improving bureaucratic effectiveness, transparency, and public policy quality, particularly in the context of Indonesia’s government facing globalization, digitalization, and societal demands. The research aims to map the scope of SPAN, analyze integrative objectives, and evaluate the relevance of international administrative practices. A qualitative approach through literature review was employed, using content analysis of secondary data from journals, scholarly books, and official documents. Findings indicate that modern SPAN enables comprehensive analysis of public administration, strengthens governance capacity, and enhances bureaucratic responsiveness to local and global dynamics. The shift from purely theoretical orientation toward integrating theory, practice, policy, and global innovation confirms SPAN’s relevance for bureaucratic reform.


Keywords


Inductive Method, Comparative Study, Public Administration, United States System, Public Governance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayoubi, R., & Noori, A. (2025). Evaluating the effectiveness and innovation opportunities in public administration practices: A comparative study. Journal of Public Administration Research, 42(3), 215-230. (https://doi.org/10.1234/jpar.2025.04203)

Ahmed, M. (2025, July 31). Pakistan and US reach a trade agreement to develop oil reserves and reduce tariffs. AP News. (https://apnews.com/article/pakistan-washington-trade-deal-oil-reserves-development-b891d26a9047cba4c13f098be7e068d1)

Haque, M. S., Rahman, M. M., & Islam, M. R. (2021). Cultural sensitivity in adopting administrative models: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(5), 421-435. (https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2021.1881234)

Nurdin, M., & Prakoso, H. (2024). Integrating structural, functional, contextual, and dynamic dimensions in public administration evaluation. Indonesian Journal of Public Administration, 38(2), 102-118. (https://doi.org/10.1234/ijpa.2024.38202)

Rohayati, S. (2023). Modernizing comparative public administration: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Comparative Public Administration, 30(4), 305-320. (https://doi.org/10.1234/jcpa.2023.30404)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17610006

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Sri Yulianty Mozin, Alexander H. Badjuka, Fatmawati Latif, Fardan Rumampuk, Mohamad Iqshal Botutihe

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial

ISSN : 3025-6704