Amicus Curiae Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Proses Pembuktian Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia

Cecareno Gilbrani Anwar, Frans Simangunsong

Abstract


Amicus curiae is a third party that provides information, opinions, or legal analysis to the court to assist in decision-making. In the Indonesian criminal justice system, the existence of amicus curiae is still limited, but its potential is significant as additional evidence, especially in complex cases involving the public interest. This study aims to analyze the role of amicus curiae in providing factual and legal information, its relevance as evidence, and the challenges of its implementation in Indonesia. The normative legal research method uses a Statutory approach and a Conceptual Approach. The results of the study indicate that although not explicitly regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, the practice of amicus curiae can strengthen the criminal justice process by providing an independent third-party perspective, especially in cases of human rights violations, corruption, and transnational crimes. The existence of Amicus Curiae is only limited to being a guideline in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. However, in reality, Amicus Curiae does not yet have binding legal force as a process of evidence in the Indonesian criminal justice system. Therefore, in the future, Indonesia will regulate in Laws and Regulations regarding the existence of amicus curiae in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System.



Keywords


Amicus Curiae, Evidence, Indonesian Criminal Justice System

Full Text:

PDF

References


AAA. Ngurah Tini Rusmini Gorda, I. G. B. Y. S. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Kedudukan Amicus Curiae Terhadap Anak Pelaku Pelecehan Seksual. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 6(2), 6815–6822.

Agustinus, P., Rondo, M., & Firmansyah, H. (2023). Pengaruh Peran Amicus Curiae Terhadap Proses Peradilan dan Kepastian Hukum. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 4463–4468.

Ayu Pralampita, L. (2020). Kedudukan Amicus Curiae Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 5(3), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol5.iss3.art4

Bagus, M. (2022). Ragam dan Perkembangan Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Al-Jinayah Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 8(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.15642/aj.2022.8.2.141-164

Gede, D., & Praditha, E. (2023). Posisi Amicus Cureae dalam Tata Peradilan Indonesia (Dewa Gede Edi Praditha) | 35 Madani. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipline, 1(5), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7978462

Gusti Ayu Gita Dharma Vahini Mahiratna, & Nabilah Assa’diyah Tisya. (2024). Eksistensi Amicus Curiae dalam Perkara Narkotika oleh Pelaku Anak Berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Indonesia . Unes Law Review, 6(4), 10889–10896.

Habibi, M., Febriana, N., Karima, N. K., Sudjatmiko, B., Ilmu, M., & Universitas, H. (2025). Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis. Vol.6. No.4 (2025) Tema/Edisi : Hukum Perdata (Bulan Keempat) https://jhlg.rewangrencang.com/. 6(4), 1–18.

Irawan, O., Nahat, S., Nababan, T., Jl, A., Simatupang, T. B., Tj, N., Jagakarsa, K., & Selatan, J. (2025). Penegakkan Hukum di Negara Republik Indonesia.

Ksatria, C. A. A. D. (2025). Prinsip Amicus Curiae terhadap Putusan Hakim dalam Perkara Pidana di Indonesia. Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.61292/eljbn.255

Lomi, Y., & Sakti, M. (2024). Peranan Keterangan Ahli Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Verstek, 12(1), 575–582.

No, V., Rosyidah, N. U., & Hasbulla, M. A. (2024). Amicus Curiae Sebagai Pertimbangan Majelis Komisi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Persaingan Usaha Fakultas Hukum , Universitas Islam Darul ‘ Ulum Lamongan Abstract Abstrak Pendahuluan Kegiatan usaha yang dilakukan oleh sesama manusia sudah pasti memunculkan s. 1(1), 43–66.

Nugroho, D., & Firmansyah, H. (2023). Implementasi Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dalam Kasus Investasi Di Plaftorm Binomo untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan Bagi Korban. Unes Law Review, 6(2), 5031–5039. https://review-unes.com/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Pid, N., Jkt, B. P. N., Nadzirah, D., & Saputra, F. (2025). HUKUMAN BAGI BHARADA RICHARD ELIEZER ( Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. 8(2), 80–101.

Reandi, A. R. D., & Simangunsong, F. (2024). Penerapan Sanksi Tindak Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Judi Online Di Indonesia. Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik, 2(2), 277–288.

Rizal, F. N., & Santoso, B. (2024). TELAAH URGENSI AMICUS CURIAE DALAM KERANGKA. 1(1), 137–146.

Rochmah, S., & Simangunsong, F. (2023). Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, 3(1), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v3i1.177

Siber, D. I. R., Rumengan, C. R., & Musa, A. A. (2025). Jurnal Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sam Ratulangi Vol. 15 No. 4 (2025): Lex Privatum. 15(4).

Sucipta, D. H., & Darma, I. M. W. (2022). Amicus Curiae As the Development of Evidence in Criminal Procedure Code. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v7i1.576

Sukinta. (2021). Konsep dan Praktik Pelaksanaan Amicus Curiae Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Online Administrative Law & Governance Journal, 4(1), 2621–2781. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt4d42718991ad6/dasar-hukum-sahabat-pengadilan-amicus-

Suryani, D. E., Tampubolon, K. C., & Sihombing, P. D. (2021). Assistance of Children in Conflict with the Law during the Investigation Process at Medan Police. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal, 5(2), 13876–13881.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17390193

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Cecareno Gilbrani Anwar, Frans Simangunsong

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial

ISSN : 3025-6704