Peran dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pelayanan Kepada Publik Sesuai Dengan Moral Etika Profesi dan Undang-Undang
Abstract
The existence of a notary as a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds has actually been confirmed in Article 1868 of the Civil Code. However, in reality, what happens sometimes is: authentic deeds which are ascertained by the notary not only are intervened by the government but also involve a lot of problems that lead to lawsuits in court, even though the notary has the role of authenticating the deeds that provide legal certainty (vide Article 1970 of the Civil Code) in private legal actions. Therefore, the problem is how the role and responsibility of the notary in service to the public can be in accordance with the profession’s ethical morals and laws. To answer the problem, the method used is critical legal studies. Both Article 1868 and Article 1870 of the Civil Code as well as the laws on the position of notaries are used as the analytic blades to the problem. Referring to such provisions, it is concluded that authentic deeds area perfect proofthat aimsto ensure legal certainty and protection, for the parties. Thus, order can be created in the traffic of private law. The role of a notary is seen from the legality and formalityof an authentic deed which must be met by those appearing, and those appearing arerecognized by the notary. In order for the role and responsibility to be carried out properly, a notary is demanded by the profession’sethical morals (code of ethics) and laws on notary position. Such responsibility is a logical consequence that must be requested from a legal profession including a notary in carrying out his or her duties. The responsibility is not only based on morals but also based on laws especially Law Number 30 of 2004 on Notary Position, in conjunction with Law Number 2 of 2014 on Notary Position
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aburaera, Sukarno, Muhadar dan Maskun, Filsafat Hukum: Teori dan Praktek, Cetakan
ke-I, Kencana Pranada Media Group, Jakarta, 2013.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly dan Ali Safa’at, Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum, Cetakan ke-2, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta, 2012.
Bentham, Jeremy, The Theory of Legislation, diterjermahkan oleh Nurhadi, Teori Perundang-undangan: Prinsip-prinsip Legislasi, Cetakan I, Nusa Media & Nuansa, Bandung, 2006.
Bruggink, J.J.H, Rechtsreflecties, Grondbegrippren uit de rechtstheorie, Edisi Indonesia, Refleksi tentang Hukum, diterjermahkan oleh B. Arief Sidharta, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1996.
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Modul Tanggung Jawab Profesi, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, 2007.
Friedmann, W, Legal Theory, diterjermahkan oleh Mohamad Arifin, Teori & Filsafat Hukum: Telaah Kritis Atas Teori-Teori Hukum, Cetakan Ke-2, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 1993.
Fuady, Munir, Teori-Teori Besar Dalam Hukum (grand Theory), Cetakan ke-2, PT. Kencana Pranada Media Group, Jakarta, 2013.
Ibrahim, Johnya, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan ke-III, Bayumedia, Surabaya, 2007.
Johnson, Alvin S, Sosiology of Law, diterjermahkan oleh Rinaldi Simamora, Sosiologi Hukum, Cetakan II, PT. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2004.
Kelsen, Hans, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory, diterjermahkan oleh Siwi Purwandari, Pengantar Teori Hukum, Cetakan IV, Nusa Media, Bandung, 2012.
Kelsen, Hans,, General Theory of Law and State, diterjermahkan oleh Raisul Muttaqien, Teori Umum tentang Hukum dan Negara, Cetakan IX, Nusa Media, Bandung, 2014.
Mahadi, Falsafah Hukum: Suatu Pengantar, Cetakan ke-II, Alumni, Bandung, 1991
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10516410
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Adipapa Jefrianto Bondi, Emanuel Bryan Aradoni, Maria Yovita Naif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN : 3025-6704