Author
Ramisa Piga(1
(1) Program Studi Pendidkan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pasifik Morotai,
(2) ,
(3) ,
| Article Analytic |
Available online: 2025-09-01 | Published : 2025-09-01
Article can trace at:
Article Metrics
Abstract Views: 199 times
PDF Downloaded: 124 times
Abstract
This study aims to determine whether the Student Learning Outcomes of the cooperative learning model type, Students Teams Achievement Division (STAD), can improve student learning outcomes in the subject of Civics material on freedom of organization in grade V SD Inpres Wawama, before the implementation of the cooperative type Students Teams Achievement Division (STAD), which has a low percentage level. The value obtained is only 17% of those who get a pass mark, with three out of 18 students. Furthermore, student learning outcomes after implementing the cooperative learning process type Students Teams Achievement Division (STAD) on the material of freedom of organization in SD Inpres Wawama experienced a significant increase. In the first cycle, student learning outcomes increased by 55.56% with the number of students who completed 10 students. While in the second cycle, student learning outcomes reached 83.33% with the number of students who completed as many as 15 out of 18 students in grade V SD Inpres Wawama. From the data, the results obtained show that the research conducted using the Students Teams Achievement Division (STAD) cooperative learning model was successful with satisfactory scores and exceeded the KKM score, namely 75.
Keywords
References
Abdullah, Ridwan. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Medan: cipta pustaka Media Perintis, 2012.
Ananda, Rusydi. Inovasi Pendidikan. Medan: CV Widya Puspita, 2017.
Bakar, Rosdiana Abu. Pendidikan suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Cita Pustaka Media Perintis, 2012.
Cahyono, Agus N. Pamduan Aplikasi Teori Belajar Mengajar. Yogyakarta: Diva Press, 2013.
Faturrahman, Muhammad. Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Jogjakarta: Ar- Ruz Media, 2015
Hamalik, Oemar. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara, 2010.
Istarani. 58 Model Pemeblajaran Inofatif. Medan: Media Persada, 2011
Jamara, Syaiful Bahri. Guru dan Anak Didik Dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2005.
Kunandar. Langkah Mudah Penelitian Tindakan Kelas.Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2008.
Muhibbinsyah. Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003
Ngalim Purwanto, Psikologi Pendidkan, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. 2014
Ningrum, Erpon. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak, 2014.
PERATURAN Mentri Pendidikan Nasional o. 22 tahun 2006
Purwanto, Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2014
Rizkinta, Elga Novira. Hubungan Pembelajaran Reward Dengan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Kelas V SD N 101775 Sampali. Universitas Negeri Medan, 2014.
Rusman. Model-Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo, 2014.
Sadiman. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo,2010.
Sagala, Syaiful. Supervisi Pembelajaran dalam Profesi Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010.
Salim, dkk. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Medan: perdana Publishing, 2017
Sapriya. Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan†Jakarta: Depertemen Agama RI, 2009.
Shoimin, Aris. 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruz Media. 2016
Slameto. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010
Wardoyo. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2013.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
