Human-Centered Innovation as a Strategy for Responding to Changing Consumer Needs: A Systematic Literature Review

Muhammad Abbas, LD B Ruslan, Darmawang D, Andi Yasril Ananta, Megawaty M

Abstract


Rapid changes in consumer needs driven by digitalization, evolving preferences, and rising expectations for customer experience require organizations to innovate in ways that remain responsive to users’ contexts. This article develops a synthesis framework for examining human-centered innovation (HCI) as an organizational strategy for sensing, interpreting, and responding to changing consumer needs. The review is designed as a systematic literature review reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020, addressing HCI definitions and operationalization, implementation practices, innovation outcomes, and enabling or constraining conditions. Foundational literature and prior reviews suggest the relevance of latent-needs research, co-creation, iterative experimentation, and organizational learning; however, the benefits of customer participation vary across innovation stages and contexts. An integrative conceptual model is proposed linking changing consumer needs, HCI practices, dynamic capabilities, and customer and organizational outcomes. Final empirical synthesis, study counts, and quality appraisal will be completed after documented searching, screening, and extraction. The contribution of this draft is a testable conceptual framework and transparent synthesis protocol. Claims regarding HCI effectiveness remain provisional until the systematic review has been completed.


Keywords


human-centered innovation; design thinking; consumer needs; co-creation; dynamic capabilities; PRISMA 2020.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.

Chang, W., & Taylor, S. A. (2016). The effectiveness of customer participation in new product development: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 47–64.

Gamble, J. R., Brennan, M., & McAdam, R. (2019). A contemporary and systematic literature review of user-centric innovation: A consumer perspective. In Managing innovation: Understanding and motivating crowds (pp. 3–46). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781786346490_0001

Ghasemzadeh, K., Bortoluzzi, G., & Yordanova, Z. (2022). Collaborating with users to innovate: A systematic literature review. Technovation, 116, Article 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102487

Göttgens, I., & Oertelt-Prigione, S. (2021). The application of human-centered design approaches in health research and innovation: A narrative review of current practices. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 9(12), Article e28102. https://doi.org/10.2196/28102

Hong, Q. N., et al. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291.

Hoyer, W. D., Chandy, R., Dorotic, M., Krafft, M., & Singh, S. S. (2010). Consumer cocreation in new product development. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510375604

International Organization for Standardization. (2019). ISO 9241-210:2019: Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Human-centred design for interactive systems.

Jain, S., Sharma, K., & Devi, S. (2024). The dynamics of value co-creation behavior: A systematic review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(1), Article e12993. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12993

Mayer, S., & Schwemmle, M. (2025). The impact of design thinking and its underlying theoretical mechanisms: A review of the literature. Creativity and Innovation Management, 34(1), 78–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12626

Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Rösch, N., Tiberius, V., & Kraus, S. (2023). Design thinking for innovation: Context factors, process, and outcomes. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0164

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17.

von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24191961

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Abbas, LD B Ruslan, Darmawang D, Andi Yasril Ananta, Megawaty M

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial

ISSN : 3025-6704