Legal Protection of Heirs Affected by Authentic Deeds Based on False Statements
Abstract
Authentic deeds possess conclusive evidentiary value in civil legal relationships. However, legal disputes may arise when an authentic deed is drawn up based on false statements provided by an appearer, resulting in losses to heirs who have legal rights to inherited property. This study aims to analyze the legal standing of heirs affected by authentic deeds based on false statements, the civil liability of notaries, and the legal consequences and evidentiary mechanisms involved. This research employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials consist of relevant legislation, legal books, and scientific articles, which are analyzed qualitatively through legal reasoning. The findings indicate that the legal status and rights of heirs arise from inheritance relationships rather than from the existence of an authentic deed. Therefore, the evidentiary strength of an authentic deed cannot extinguish the substantive rights of heirs that can be established through other admissible evidence. A notary's civil liability does not automatically arise merely because an authentic deed contains false statements. Instead, such liability requires proof of a breach of professional duties, fault or negligence, damage, and a causal relationship. Furthermore, the legal consequences affecting an authentic deed must be distinguished according to the source of the defect, whether it concerns formal deficiencies or the material falsity of statements provided by the appearer. Accordingly, legal protection for heirs requires a clear distinction between the liability of the appearer and that of the notary, as well as appropriate remedies based on the established legal facts and available evidence. This study emphasizes the importance of implementing the principle of prudence in notarial practice and ensuring proportionate evidentiary assessments to achieve legal certainty, justice, and the protection of heirs' rights.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adjie, H. (2011). Hukum notaris Indonesia: Tafsir tematik terhadap Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Refika Aditama.
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.
Ariyanto, T., & Sudarto, S. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban pidana notaris dalam tindak pidana membantu menyuruh menempatkan keterangan palsu ke dalam akta otentik. Iblam Law Review, 4(3), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v4i3.514
Bagaswara, R., & Prananingtyas, P. (2022). Urgensi akta otentik dalam keterangan hak waris yang dibuat oleh notaris. Notarius, 16(2), 938–947. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i2.41832
Chasanah, I., & Buana, N. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban notaris terhadap akta otentik yang dibuat dihadapannya (Studi kantor notaris di Kabupaten Wonogiri). IJIJEL, 3(1), 734–743. https://doi.org/10.62976/ijijel.v3i1.996
Damayanti, D. (2024). Tanggung jawab pidana terhadap notaris yang telah memalsukan keterangan dalam akta autentik (Studi kasus Putusan Nomor 1362/Pid.B/2019/PN.Jkt.Utr). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Humaniora dan Politik, 4(4), 930–935. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2112
Prananda, V. (2018). Perlindungan hukum terhadap notaris atas pembuatan akta oleh penghadap yang dinyatakan palsu (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 385 K/PID/2006). Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani, 8(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.26623/humani.v8i2.1378
Prayitno, U., & Saleh, M. (2023). The urgency of applying Article 39 paragraph (2) UUJN against prevention of indications of criminal acts in notary deeds. Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam, 15(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v15i1.5635
Qotrannadha, D., & Tanawijaya, H. (2023). Penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian notaris dalam pembuatan akta otentik yang penghadapnya menggunakan identitas palsu. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(5), 3188–3197. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i5.11804
Subiyantana, S., & Octarina, N. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap notaris yang membuat keterangan palsu dalam akta otentik. Jurnal Rechtens, 9(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.36835/rechtens.v9i2.786
Suhartati, S. (2020). Penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian pembuatan akta otentik pada kantor notaris Kabupaten Gowa. Petitum, 8(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.36090/jh.v8i2.819
Wijayanti, M., & Tedjosaputro, L. (2022). Akibat hukum pembuatan surat keterangan hak waris dengan keterangan tidak benar oleh para penghadap. Notary Law Research, 4(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.56444/nlr.v4i1.3420
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23983660
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Meisya Raafiani Putri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN : 3025-6704





