Implementation of Assessment Standards Based on Learners’ Needs at PKBM Cahaya Ilmu Pekanbaru

Rafael Chasyanova, Rahmat Fahmi

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the implementation of needs-based assessment standards for learners at the Cahaya Ilmu Community Learning Center (PKBM) in Pekanbaru. The approach used was qualitative, with data collection methods through observation, interviews, and questionnaires involving tutors, administrators, and learners. The results showed that the implementation of assessment standards in PKBM was carried out flexibly and contextually, adapting to the diverse characteristics and needs of learners. Needs identification was carried out through initial assessments, observations, group discussions, and grouping of learners' abilities. The form of assessment not only focused on cognitive aspects but also included skills and attitudes through direct practice, portfolios, and authentic assessments. In addition, learners were involved in the assessment process through self-reflection and active participation in learning activities. However, in its implementation, there were still obstacles such as limited facilities and infrastructure, tutor competency, and variations in learners' learning motivations. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the capacity of tutors and develop more effective assessment instruments so that assessment standards can support the improvement of learning quality and empower learners optimally.


Keywords


assessment standards, needs of learners, PKBM, authentic assessment, non-formal education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andriani, D. (2021). Assessment in nonformal education context. Journal of Education Research, 15(2), 120–135.

Arifin, Z. (2022). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2021). Rethinking assessment in higher education. London: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2020). Research design: Qualitative approaches. Sage.

Hattie, J. (2021). Visible learning: Feedback. Routledge.

Kemdikbudristek. (2023). Kurikulum Merdeka dan asesmen. Jakarta.

Knowles, M. (2020). Adult learning theory. Routledge.

Merriam, S. B. (2020). Adult learning and development. Jossey-Bass.

Sudjana, N. (2021). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2020). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2020.1734043

Direktorat Pendidikan Masyarakat dan Pendidikan Khusus. (2021). Pedoman penyelenggaraan pendidikan kesetaraan. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). Standar nasional pendidikan. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen pendidikan kesetaraan. Jakarta: Kemendikbudristek.

Mardapi, D. (2021). Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.

Mulyasa, E. (2022). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka dalam pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nurdin, S., & Adriantoni. (2020). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Rukajat, A. (2021). Teknik evaluasi pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2020). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

UNESCO. (2021). Non-formal education and lifelong learning: Policy and practice. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20280602

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Rafael Chasyanova, Rahmat Fahmi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial

ISSN : 3025-6704