Legal Protection of Educators Against Criminalization in the Enforcement of Student Discipline
Abstract
This study aims to analyze legal protection for educators against the threat of criminalization in the implementation of student discipline. The main issue lies in the antinomy between laws protecting the teaching profession and child protection laws, which often creates legal uncertainty. The method used is normative legal research with a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach based on the PRISMA protocol applied to scientific literature. The results show that the criminalization of teachers is triggered by the failure to distinguish between educational disciplinary actions (animus corrigendi) and acts of violence (animus nocendi), as well as a law enforcement approach that tends to be overly legalistic without considering pedagogical dimensions. Weak implementation of norms and social pressures further exacerbate the situation. This study concludes that there is a need to reconstruct the legal paradigm by affirming protection for proportional disciplinary actions, as well as strengthening professional ethical mechanisms and justice-based approaches to prevent excessive criminalization of educators.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Freeman, M. (2010). Children's Rights and the Law: A New Global Perspective. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 18(4), 543-568.
Fitriani, R. (2021). "Fobia Kriminalisasi: Dampak KUHP terhadap Perilaku 'Defensive Teaching' di Tingkat Sekolah Menengah." Jurnal Dogmatika Hukum & Sosiologi, 12(2), 110-129.
Lenta, P. (2012). Corporal Punishment of Children and the Role of In Loco Parentis doctrine. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 32(4), 689-716.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339, b2535.
Nugroho, A. B. (2023). "Hak Imunitas dan Supremasi Dewan Kehormatan Guru sebagai Filter Keadilan Restoratif Pidana." Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Yurisprudensi, 15(1), 45-62.
Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 89.
Rahayu, E. (2022). "Kriminalisasi Guru dalam Ekologi Child Rights." Jurnal Sosio-Legal Pendidikan, 5(2), 88-105.
Reddon, J. R., et al. (2008). The Chilling Effect of Child Abuse Laws on Public School Educators. International Journal of Law and Education, 15(1), 40-59.
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. Springer Publishing Company.
Setiawan, H., et al. (2020). "Antinomi Hukum Perlindungan Anak dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 74 Tahun 2008." Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara & Pidana, 8(3), 200-215.
Supriadi, E., & Harahap, T. (2019). "Menakar Batas Mens Rea dan Kewenangan Disiplin Guru: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1554 K/PID/2013." Jurnal Negara Hukum, 10(2), 178-195.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19886650
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Laurentius Ni

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Â
Â
ISSN :Â 3025-6704




