Handling of Truant School Children by the Civil Service Police Unit (Satpol PP) (Case Study of Satpol PP Pekanbaru)
Abstract
The handling procedures carried out by the Civil Service Police Unit (Satpol PP) of Pekanbaru City toward school students who skip classes outside school during study hours are reflected in data from a raid in October 2025, which netted 31 students from various secondary schools in Pekanbaru City. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study method, where data were collected through in-depth interviews with 11 informants consisting of Satpol PP officers, guidance and counseling teachers, vice principals, students caught in the raid, and community figures. Data analysis applies the crime prevention strategy theory of Tonry and Farrington (1995), which divides prevention into three levels: primary, secondary, and tertiary. The results show that Satpol PP has implemented handling procedures based on Regional Regulation Number 13 of 2021, including intelligence monitoring, field security operations, data collection, in-office counseling, summoning parents, and handing students back to schools using a persuasive and humane approach. However, several weaknesses were identified, including a weak field verification mechanism that led to some innocent students being caught in the raid, minimal effective coordination between Satpol PP and schools, suboptimal primary and secondary prevention due to a predominantly reactive approach, and deterrent effects that are not yet fully sustainable. Schools, in contrast, have proven more effective in prevention through digital attendance systems, routine counseling, and daily communication with parents. This study recommends strengthening inter-agency coordination, improving field verification procedures, and developing more structured and sustainable primary prevention programs.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Brantingham, P. J. (1981). Environmental criminology. Sage Publications.
Clarke, R. V. (1997). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies. Harrow and Heston.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Felson, M. (2002). Crime and everyday life. Sage Publications.
Ibnu Majah. (n.d.). Sunan Ibnu Majah, Hadits No. 224: “Menuntut ilmu wajib bagi setiap Muslim.â€
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Analisis data kualitatif: Buku sumber tentang metode baru (T. R. Rohidi, Trans.). UI Press.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Tonry, M., & Farrington, D. P. (1995). Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention. University of Chicago Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Bivak, A. (2025). Strategi penanganan kenakalan remaja berbasis sosial dan edukatif di wilayah perkotaan. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia, 6(1), 55–70.
Vogl, S., Schmidt, E. M., Zartler, U., & Siller, H. (2019). Triangulation in qualitative research: Potentials and risks. Forum:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19674364
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Rezi Aznan Shabila

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Â
Â
ISSN :Â 3025-6704




