The Social Construction of Knowledge in Learning: A Theoretical Review and Its Implications for Education

Rozaq Shohibul Ichsan, Mohammad Rofiq

Abstract


This article aims to analyze the social construction of knowledge in the context of learning through a theoretical review of three main frameworks: (1) social constructivist theory in education, (2) the theory of social construction by Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann in the sociology of knowledge, and (3) the concept of framing in media and communication. The research method employed is a systematic literature review with a philosophical–analytical approach. The analysis shows that knowledge in education is not an objective entity that is simply transferred, but rather the result of active construction through social interaction, language, and the dialectic of externalization, objectivation, and internalization. The social constructivist approach to learning aligns with Berger and Luckmann’s theory of social construction, in which pedagogical reality is jointly constructed by teachers and students within a socio-cultural environment. The concept of framing provides a lens for understanding how educational discourse is constructed and influenced by particular interests. The implications for education include the need for a paradigm shift toward learning that is more collaborative, reflective, critical, and sensitive to socio-cultural contexts. This article concludes that integrating these three perspectives can enrich understanding and promote more transformative educational practices that are relevant to the dynamics of contemporary society.


Keywords


Social Construction, Theory and Implications, Education.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Azzahra, N. T., Ali, S. N. L., & Bakar, M. Y. A. (2025). Teori konstruktivisme dalam dunia pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmiah Research Student, 2(2), 64–75.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). SAGE Publications.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Pemahaman teoritik teori konstruksi sosial. (n.d.). Unpublished manuscript.

Salsabila, S. S., & Gumiandari, S. (2024). Pendekatan konstruktivis sosial dalam pembelajaran. Educational Journal: General and Specific Research, 4(1), 170–178.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18522523

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Rozaq Shohibul Ichsan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial

ISSN : 3025-6704