An Analysis of The Implied Meaning of Love in Robert Burn’s Poem “A Red, Red Rose” (Structural Analysis)
Abstract
This study examines the implied meaning of love in Robert Burns’ A Red, Red Rose through a structural approach, integrating Cognitive Poetics, Conceptual Metaphor Theory, and structuralist perspectives. Using qualitative analysis, each stanza is explored to identify figurative devices such as similes, hyperboles, symbolism, repetition, rhyme, and meter, and to interpret how these elements convey nuanced emotional meanings. The findings reveal that stanza 1 presents love as fresh and harmonious; stanza 2 emphasizes its enduring nature across time; stanza 3 expresses a cosmic and temporal climax; and stanza 4 depicts a dignified farewell, highlighting constancy, hope, and devotion. Overall, Burns’ integration of figurative language and structural patterns demonstrates love as eternal, resilient, and harmoniously balanced. Suggestions for future research include applying cognitive and cross-cultural approaches to poetry, while educators and students are encouraged to analyze the interplay of form and figurative devices to deepen understanding of implied meaning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abro, S. (2023). Stylistics analysis of Robert Burns poem “A Red, Red Rose”. Advances in Social Behavior Research, 3(1), 1–10.
Anwar, R., & Yusuf, F. (2022). Romantic expression through symbolism and hyperbole in modern poetry. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research, 10(2), 90–96.
Chapman, J. (2021). Stylistics and the implied meaning in poetry. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cuddon, J. A., & Habib, M. A. R. (2022). The Penguin dictionary of literary terms and literary theory (5th ed., Reprint). Efinito.
Culler, J. (2021). Literary theory: A very short introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Gibbs, R. W. (2020). Figurative meaning construction in language and thought. Cambridge University Press.
Ibrahim, A. (2020). Exploring emotion and memory in Romantic poetry. Journal of Romanticism Studies, 3(1), 1–12.
Hasan, M., & Iqbal, M. (2019). Implication and inference in Urdu poetry: A stylistic study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 287–296.
study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 15(1), 287–296.
Kim, H., & Lee, S. (2020). Figurative language and imagery in contemporary poetry: A semantic approach. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 8(3), 110–117.
Klarer, M. (2023). An introduction to literary studies (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Kövecses, Z. (2020). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kumar, R. (2018). Narrative structure in English poetry: A structuralist reading. Journal of Literary Criticism and Theory, 11(4), 112–119.
Leithauser, B. (2022). Rhyme's rooms: The architecture of poetry. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Li, X. (2022). Structuralist approach to analyzing implied meanings in modern lyric poetry. Literary Studies Review, 14(2), 23–31.
Stockwell, P. (2021). The language of literature: An introduction to stylistics. Routledge.
Stockwell, P. (2021). Cognitive poetics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Tsur, R. (1983). What is cognitive poetics. In Toward a theory of cognitive poetics (p. 10). Elsevier.
Zhang, X. (2021). Development and critiques of conceptual metaphor theory. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(11), 1487–1491.
Wordsworth, W. (2003). Preface to Lyrical Ballads. In D. Perkins (Ed.), English Romantic Writers (pp. 597–604). Harcourt.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17411553
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ayu Aprilia Tuna, Adriansyah Abu Katili, Farid Muhamad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN : 3025-6704





