Identitas Budaya dan Komunikasi Lintas Budaya Antara Orang Tionghoa Totok Dengan Peranakan di Kota Padang
Abstract
This study discusses the dynamics of cross-cultural communication between Chinese Totok de Peranakan in Padang city. Although both communities are descended from a common ancestor of Chinese origin. However both these ethnic groups have different cultural identities and traditions which indirectly these differences have led to the emergence of social distance between them. The study methodology is divided into three parts. Firstly, the data collection methodology employed interview guidelines (In-depth interviews) against the study informants. Second, the informant selection methodology uses the Snowball rule where the first informant is as the key informant. The informants consisted of seven people where 3 informants came from the Chinese community of Totok, 3 people came from the Chinese community of Peranakan and 1 informant came from the local residents of Padang city. Third, the data analysis methodology employed qualitative rules. The findings of the study revealed that the differences in cultural identity and traditions by each community caused them to live in isolation where the Chinese people have undergone a thorough process of assimilation so that the ethnic Chinese community speaks Minang fluently when communicating with ethnic Minangs cross-culturally. Manakala Chinese people still hold on to Chinese cultural values so they tend to speak Minang mixed with Mandarin dialect when communicating cross-culturally with Peranakan Chinese or communicating with locals.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdullah, I. (2006). Konstruksi dan Reproduksi Kebudayaan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Ahmad Sihabudin (2013). Komunikasi Antarbudaya, Satu Perspektif Multidimensi, PT Bumi Aksara
Awwali, Muchlis. (2015). Pelangi Di Minangkabau. Padang: SURI Surau Institute for Conservation
Abdullah I. 2002. Desentralisasi, globalisasi dan demokrasi lokal: Diversity budaya, hak-hak budaya daerah dan politik lokal di Indonesia. LP3ES, Jakarta.
Atkinson, Paul., Hammersley, Martyn. 2019. Ethnography: Principles in practice.
Routledge.
Attubani, Riwayat. 2017. Pepatah Petitih dan Adat Minangkabau. Padang: Createspace
Berry, B. 1965. Race and ethnic relations. Bostony: Houghton Mifflin.
Boas, F. 1940. Race, language and culture. New York: Double-day
Daryusti. 2006. Hegemoni penghulu dalam perspektif budaya. Pustaka, Yogyakarta.
Damsar (2005) The Perception of the problem of local autonomy: Respons of West Sumatera to the implementation of the law no.22/ 1999. Universitas Andalas Press, Padang.
Errington, F.K. 1984. Manners and Meaning in West Sumatra. The Social Context of Consciousness. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Ennaji, M. (2005). Multilingualism, Cultural Identity, and Education in Morocco. Springer Science & Business Media hal. 19-23
Erniwati. 2007. Asap Hio Di Ranah Minang: Komunitas Tionghoa di Sumatera Barat. Padang: Penerbit Ombak
Erniwati. 2012. 140 tahun HBT. Padang: Grafindo Press
Giddens A. 1991. Modernity and self-Identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge Polity Press, New York.
Hall, S. (1990) Cultural Identity and Diaspora. London: Gate
Kezia Natalia Sjofjan, Suzy S. Azeharie (2018). Studi Komunikasi Budaya di Kota Padang (Akulturasi Budaya Minangkabau Pada Etnis Tionghoa di Kota Padang) Jurnal Koneksi EISSN 2598 - 0785 Vol. 2, No. 2, Desember 2018, Hal 409-416
Kinasih, W. (2007). Identitas Etnis Tionghoa di Kota Solo. Yogyakarta: Laboratorium Jurusan Ilmu Pemerintahan FISIP UGM
Koentjaraningrat. (2000). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: Radar Jaya Offset
Larry A. Samovar; Richard E. Porter and Edwin R. McDaniel (2010). Komunikasi Lintas Budaya, Communication Between Cultures, Salemba Humanika
Liliweri, Alo. (2002). Makna Budaya dalam Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Yogyakarta: LKIS.
Moleong, Lexy J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
McQuail, Dennis. 2010. Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage Publication.
Mustajab, A. (2015). Kebijakan Politik Gus Dur terhadap China Tionghoa di Indonesia. In Right : Jurnal Agama Dan Hak Azazi Manusia, 5(1), 153–192.
Nisa, J. (2021). Stereotip dan Prasangka dalam Komunikasi Antarbudaya Muslim Pribumi dan Etnis Cina (I. Silviani (ed.); 1st ed.). Scopindo Media Pustaka.
Nasution, R. D. 2017. Pengaruh Modernisasi dan Globalisasi terhadap Perubahan Sosial Budaya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian 39 Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik, 21(1), 30–42.
Sanjaya, I., Suswandari, S., & Gunawan, R. (2022). Nilai Nilai–nilai tradisi budaya Cap Go Meh pada masyarakat Cina Benteng di Tangerang sebagai sumber pembelajaran di sekolah. Satwika: Kajian Ilmu Budaya Dan Perubahan Sosial, 6(2), 385–402.
Santosa, R. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Kebahasaan. Surakarta. UNS Press
Setiyadi, Tulus. 2016. Menelusuri Jejak Tradisi Membangun Jati Diri. Madiun: CV Raditeens
Saroni, S. 2018. Pengaruh Globalisasi Terhadap Eksistensi Kebudayaan Daerah. Aviasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Kedirgantaraan, 15(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.52186/aviasi.v15i1.5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16616678
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Delpa D

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN : 3025-6704





