Delay Notification of PT Kusumasentral Kencana Share Acquisition By PT Inter Sarana Prabawa (Study of KPPU Verdict Number 10/KPPU-M/2021)

Cindy Prescelly, Fendi Setyawan, Yusuf Adiwibowo

Abstract


Laws were created as guidelines for social life and aim to harmonize and maintain order in social life. Law also has a role in economic development in Indonesia. Therefore, law is needed as a way out to avoid conflicts that often occur amidst the limited rights possessed by humans themselves, especially legal certainty regarding the development of a business, especially in the world of business competition. Case with Decision Number 10/KPPU-M/2021 where the case in this Decision is that there was a delay in notification of the takeover of PT shares. Kusumasentral Kencana by PT Inter Sarana Prabawa. The reported party, namely PT Inter Sarana Prabawa, violated Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition and Government Regulation Number 57 of 2010 concerning Mergers or Consolidations of Business Entities and Takeovers of Company Shares which could Result in Monopoly Practices and Competition. Unhealthy Business. Analyze and answer legal issues related to the problem in this thesis, namely what is the ratio decidendi from Decision Number 10/KPPU-M/2021 regarding the delay in notification of the takeover of PT shares. Kusumasentral Kencana by PT Inter Sarana Prabawa? What are the legal consequences for business actors who violate the provisions of Article 29 of Law Number 5 of 1999. The aim of this research is, among other things, to determine the ratio decidendi from Decision Number 10/KPPU-M/2021 regarding the delay in notification of the takeover of PT shares. Kusumasentral Kencana by PT Inter Sarana Prabawa and find out the consequences for business players who violate the provisions of Article 29 of Law Number 5 of 1999. This research applies a normative juridical research type and uses a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. Then, the legal materials used are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and non-legal materials The conclusion of this thesis contains conclusions and suggestions, where the conclusion contains Decision Number 10/KPPU-M/2021 which has been decided by the Commission Council in accordance with the provisions of Business Competition Law in Indonesia in this case the Commission Council decided that the Reported Party is PT Inter Sarana Prabawa declared to legally and convincingly violate the provisions of Article 29 of Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopoly Practices and Unfair Business Competition. Then, the second conclusion is the legal consequences of unfair business competition resulting from the Delay in Notification of the Takeover of PT Shares. Kusumasentral Kencana by PT Inter Sarana Prabawa which violates the provisions of Article 29 of Law Number 5 of 1999, then OPT Inter Sarana Prabawa as the Reported Party is subject to sanctions in the form of an administrative fine of Rp. 1000,000,000.00 (one billion rupiah).


Keywords


Delay Notification, Share Acquisition, PT Kusumasentral Kencana, PT Inter Sarana Prabawa

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul. R. Saliman, 2005, Hukum Bisnis untuk Perusahaan, Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Adi Misykatul Anwar, Pengaruh Current Ratio (CR), Debt To Equity Ratio (DER), Return On Asset (ROA) Terhadap Harga Saham, Vol. 1, No.2, (Juni).

Adis Nur Hayati, Analisis Tantangan dan Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha pada sektro E-Commerce di Indonesia, Vol. 21, No.1, 2021.

Anna Maria Tri Anggraini, Penerapan Sitem Notifikasi Post-Merger atas Pengambilalihan Saham Perusahaan berdasarkan Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Law Pro Justitia, Vol. 1, No. 1, (Desember).

Annisa Wahyu Sekarini, Keterlambatan Pemberitahuan Pengambilalihan Saham PT. Prima Top Boga oleh PT. Nippon Indosari Corp Tbk Dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Skripsi, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember, 2020.

Arie Siswanto, 2004, Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Bogor, Ghalia Indonesia

Benedictus Avianto Pramanaf, Prosedur dan Tata Cara Jual Beli Saham Perusahaan,2019, diakses dari https://legistra.id/berita/prosedurjualbeli-saham. Pada tanggal 29 Maret 2023.

C.S.T. Kansil, 2013, Pokok-Pokok Pengetahuan Hukum Dagang Indonesia, Edisi ke-2, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.

Catur Agus Saptono, 2017, Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Economic Analystic of Law) dalam Pelaksanaan Merger, Jakarta, Kencana.

I Putu Sudarma Sumadi, Penegakan Ilmu Persaingan Usaha, 2015, Vol. 3, 2015.

Iswi Hariyani, 2017, Restrukturisasi Perusahaan dalam Perspektif Hukum Bisnis pada Berbagai Jenis Badan Usaha, Jakarta, Andi Offset

Joenaedi Efendi dan Johny Ibrahim, 2016, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris, Depok, Paramedia Group.

Joshua Anggelito Parapang, Tugas dan Wewenang Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) dalam Penanganan Pelanggaran Hukum Persaingan Usaha Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor Tahun 1999, Lex Privatum, Vol. VII, No.7, 2019.

M. Teguh Pangestu dan Nurul Aulia, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas dan Perkembangannya di Indonesia, 2017, Vol. 01, No. 3 (April).

Moch. Dzulyadain Nasrulloh, Dampak Keterlambatan Pemberitahuan Pengambilalihan Saham Perusahaan terhadap Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, 2021, Vol. 3, No. 1. (Maret).

Munir Fuady, 2003, Perseroan Terbatas Paradigma Baru, Bandung, PT. Aditya Citra Bakti.

Munir Fuady, 2014, Hukum tentang Akuisisi (Take Over dan LBO), Bandung, PT. Aditya Citra Bakti.

Mustafa Kamal Rokan, 2010, Hukum Persaingan Usaha (Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia), Medan, Rajawali Pers.

Peraturan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor 4 Tahun 2012 tentang Pedoman Pengenaan Denda Keterlambatan Pemberitahuan Penggabungan/Peleburan Badan Usaha dan Pengambilalhan Saham Perusahaan.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 44 tahun 2021 tentang Pelaksanaan larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki,2019, Penelitian Hukum,Jakarta, Kencana.

Putusan Perkara Nomor 10/KPPU-M/2021” Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) 05 April 2023.

Rahmadi Usman, 2012, Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia dalam Teori dan Praktik serta Penerapannya di Indonesia, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika

Sidharta, 2019, Ratio Decidendi dan Kaidah Yuridprudensi, Binus University.

Susanti Adi Nugroho, 2012, Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia (Dalam Teori dan Praktik serta Penerapan Hukumnya), Jakarta, Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Syamsul Ma’arif, 2010, Merger Dalam Perspektif Hukum Persaingan Usaha, Jakarta, Dengan Publishing.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.

Winarno, Perumusan dan Keseimbangan Kepentingan dalam UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat serta Penerapan Hukumnya Dalam Putusan Hakim atas Perkara Persaingan Usaha, Tesis, Universitas Dipenogoro, 2009.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10654351

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Cindy Prescelly, Fendi Setyawan, Yusuf Adiwibowo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 

Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial

ISSN : 3025-6704