Tinjauan Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Dalam Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas yang Menyebabkan Orang Lain Meninggal Dunia (Studi Pada Putusan Nomor 76/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Unr)

Kurnia Sandhi Dwi Prakoso, M. Sifa’ F. Yulianis

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to discuss and analyze the application of criminal law in traffic accidents that cause other people to die in Decision Number 76 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN Unr and discuss and analyze the judge's decision in the case of traffic accidents that cause others to die in Decision Number 76 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN Unr. This research is included in normative juridical research. The results showed that the application of criminal law in traffic accidents that caused other people to die in Decision Number 76/Pid.Sus/2017/PN Unr showed that the defendant Mohamad Rosul bin Alm Damsu had been legally and conclusively proven guilty of the criminal act of driving a motor vehicle because his negligence resulted in a traffic accident resulting in death and serious injury. The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for seven months. The results also showed that the judge's decision in the case of a traffic accident that caused another person to die in Decision Number 76 / Pid.Sus / 2017 / PN Unr showed that the decision-making process carried out by the Panel of Judges was in accordance with applicable legal rules, namely based on at least two valid evidence, where the evidence used was sanski testimony,  evidence, visum et repertum of Ambarawa Regional General Hospital number: 445/VER/577/2017 dated March 29, 2017 and the defendant's statement.


Keywords


Criminal, Traffic Accident, Death

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chazawi, A. (2017). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2018). Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Hamzah, M. D. (2018). Penegakan Hukum Pada Kasus Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Yang Menyebabkan Hilangnya Nyawa Orang. Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 1 No 1 Maret .

Lamintang. (2020). Pembahasan KUHAP Menurut Ilmu Pengetahuan Hukum Pidana dan Yurisprudensi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Lamintang, P. (2014). Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Marzuki, P. M. (2020). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Moeljatno. (2018). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Moeljatno. (2019). Azas-Azas Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Armico.

Muladi, & Arief, B. N. (2017). Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Oglesby, C. H., & Hicks, R. G. (2018). Teknik Jalan Raya. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Prasetyo, T. (2020). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Remmelink, J. (2018). Hukum Pidana Komentar Atas Pasal Terpenting Dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Sudarto. (2014). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Suhardi, B., Rosyidasari, A., & Adhitya, K. F. (2023). Ergonomi Transportasi Implementasi Desain Rambu-Rambu Lalu Lintas dan Model Fitness For Duty. Sleman: Deepublish.

Syarifin, P. (2020). Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Takdir. (2013). Mengenal Hukum Pidana. Palopo: Penerbit Laskar Perubahan.

Wahyuni, F. (2017). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Tangerang Selatan: PT Nusantara Persada Utama.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Kurnia Sandhi Dwi Prakoso, M. Sifa’ F. Yulianis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 


Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial

ISSN : 3025-6704