Analisis Berpikir Logis Siswa SMP Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar
Abstract
This study aims to determine how students' logical thinking ability to solve mathematical problems is reviewed from visual learning styles, auditory learning styles and kinesthetic learning styles. This study uses a qualitative research method. This study took research subjects from students of Takhasus Nuril Anwar Maron Middle School in Purworejo Regency. The study took 6 students as research subjects, previously there were 24 students, namely 2 students with visual learning styles, 2 students with auditory learning styles and 2 students with kinesthetic learning styles. The research subjects were selected based on the Learning Style Questionnaire and teacher considerations. Data collection in this study used a learning style questionnaire, tests, field notes, interviews, and documentation. This study used triangulation data analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that: (1) Students with visual learning styles (V1 and V2) have gone through the stages of classification, connecting, calculating and drawing conclusions properly and correctly. (2) Students with auditory learning styles (A1 and A2) have gone through the stages of classification, connecting, calculating and drawing conclusions properly and correctly. There are differences in the classification and connecting and calculating stages, namely tending not to write down the information obtained in the questions so that sometimes it takes a long time and more often rereading the questions to determine the solution formula and calculating on another paper or through imagination or not written on the answer sheet. (3) Students with a kinesthetic learning style (K1 and K2) have gone through the classification, connecting, calculating and drawing conclusions stages properly and correctly. There are differences in the classification and connecting stages, namely using aids by tending to describe what is known into a picture so that they can easily determine what is being asked and not be wrong. However, in general, logical thinking skills must be honed and applied to facilitate understanding of the material process and solving problems rationally.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andriawan, B. 2014. Identifikasi Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pada Siswa Kelas VIII-1 SMP Negeri 2 Sidoarjo. Skripsi Tidak Dipublikasikan. Surabaya: Jurusan Matematika Universitas Negeri Surabaya.
Andriawan, B., & Budiarto, M. T. 2014. “Identifikasi Kemampuan Berpikir Logis dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pada Siswa Kelas VIII-1 SMP Negeri 2 Sidoarjo.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 42-48.
Depdiknas. 2002. Teori-Teori Perkembangan Kognitif dan Proses Pembelajaran yang Relevan untuk Pembelajaran Matematika. Pelatihan Terintegrasi berbasis kompetensi.
DePorter, B. & Mike, H. 2013. Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa.
Erawati & Sugeng, S. 2020. “Analisis Kesulitan Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Kategori Higher Order Thinking Skills Menurut Tahapan Polya”. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika. Vol. 13, Nomor 2, 2020.
Jaleel, S., Anne, M. T. 2019. Learning Styles: Theories and Implications for Teaching Learning. USA: Horizon Research Publishing. Tersedia di: https://www.hrpub.org.
Mundiri. 2014. Logika. Cetakan 16. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Ni’matus. 2011. Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas VII-C SMP Negeri 12 Surabaya. Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan. Surabaya: Unesa
Ningsih, T.R., & Bharata, Haninda. “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Matematis Peserta Didik SMA Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Pada Materi Geometri Ruang Dalam Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19”. Jurnal JEMS. 9(2) 2021, 457-468.
Nurman, T. 2008. Kemampuan Siswa SMP dalam Memecahkan Masalah Buku Berakhir ditinjau dari Perbedaan Tingkat Kemampuan Matematika. Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan. Surabaya: Pasca Sarjana Unesa.
Polya, G. 1973. How to Solve it, Second Edition. Princeton. New Jersey Princeton University Press.
Ramble, M. S. & Nevi, Y. 2019. “Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa SMA Dian Andalas Padang”. Jurnal JRPP. Vol. 2, Nomor 1, 2019.
Saragih, S. 2007. Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berfikir Logis dan Komunikasi Matematik Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama Melalui Pendekatan Matematik Realistik. Skripsi Tidak diterbitkan. Bandung. Program Pascasarjana UPI.
Setiadi, D. 2017. Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Matematis Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Bangun Ruang dengan Menggunakan Strategi Problem Solving di Kelas IX SMPN 2 Mataraman. Skripsi tidak dipublikasikan.. Banjarmasin: Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keagamaan Institut Agama Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin.
Sholihah, S. Z. & Ekasatya, A. A. 2017. “Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Proses Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tahapan Berpikir Van Hiele”. Jurnal Mosyarafa. Vol. 6, Nomor 2, 2017.
Solso. R. Robert, Maclin. H. Otto, Maclin. Kimberly. M. 2007. Psikologi Kognitif.
Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumarmo, Utari. Hidayat, Wahyu., Zukarnaen, Rafiq., Hamidah, Hamidah., Sariningsih, Ratna.. 2012. “Kemampuan dan Disposisi Berpikir Logis, Krisis, dan Kreatif Matematik (Eksperimen terhadap Siswa SMA Menggunakan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dan Strategi Think-Talk-Write)”. Jurnal Pelajaran MIPA Volume 17 No. 1 April 2012 Halaman 17-33 ISSN: 1412-0917. Jurnal (Online).
Tarhadi. 2007. Penggunaan Tes Uraian Dibandingkan dengan Tes Pilihan Ganda Terstruktur dan Tes Pilihan Ganda Biasa. Article. https:researchgate.net/publication/320843012.
Usdiyana, Dian. Purniati, Tia., Yulianti, Kartika., Harningsih, Eha.. 2009. “Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Siswa SMP Melalui Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik”. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA Volume 13 No. 1 April 2009 ISSN: 1412-0917.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Prasetyo Budi Darmono

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN : 3025-6704





