Analisis Jaminan Hak-Hak Pekerja Pada PT. Mas Murni Indonesia (Hotel Garden Palace Surabaya): Studi Kasus Putusan MAHKAMAH AGUNG Nomor 1565 K/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2022

Rizal Ananda Gibran, Imanuel Nelson Putra Siagian, Moses Frederick Purba

Abstract


Hotel Garden Palace Surabaya, operated by PT MAS MURNI INDONESIA, declared bankrupt by the Surabaya Commercial Court, conducted mass layoffs without paying severance to approximately 200 employees. According to Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower, even if a company is declared bankrupt, the curator must continue business operations and fulfill obligations like salary payments. The Industrial Relations Court has absolute authority to resolve labor disputes, including rights disputes, interest disputes, and termination disputes. Workers who were unilaterally laid off by Hotel Garden Palace Surabaya can file a lawsuit with the Commercial Court based on Article 153 of the Manpower Law. Factors affecting the effectiveness of the Industrial Relations Court include the involvement of related parties, the competence of judges, resource limitations, and the involvement of mediation institutions. The implementation of dispute resolution mechanisms through the Industrial Relations Court significantly impacts workers' rights, employers' obligations, and the industrial relations climate. The court ensures proper compensation for workers who are unilaterally laid off and provides legal protection, ultimately increasing workers' confidence in their rights and stabilizing industrial relations at Hotel Garden Palace Surabaya. In conclusion, the Industrial Relations Court plays an essential role in enforcing labor laws and ensuring protection and justice for laid-off workers, even in situations of company bankruptcy.


Keywords


Termination of Employment, Industrial Relations Court, Company Bankruptcy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bambang, R. J. (2013). Hukum Ketenagakerjaan. Pustaka Setia.

Dewi, S., & Utama, A. S. (2022). Penyelesaian Hak-hak Buruh dalam Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja di PT Malindo Karya Lestari. Andrew Law Journal, 1(1), 14-21.

Hidayat, A. (2017). Hak Tenaga Kerja pada Perusahaan yang Dinyatakan Pailit. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(1), 23-32.

Remen, O., Suhartini, E., & Yumarni, A. (2018). Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Pada PT. Haengnam Sejahtera Indonesia di Tingkat Mediasi Pada Dinas Tenaga Kerja Kabupaten Bogor. Jurnal Hukum De'rechtsstaat.

Sutedi, A. (2009). Hukum Perburuhan. Sinar Grafika.

Ujang Charda S., “Reaktulisasi Supremasi Hukum dalam Merekonstruksi Lembaga Peradilan Menuju Indonesia Baru”, Jurnal Jurista Insentif’06, Vol. 1 No. 1, Kopertis Wilayah IV Jabar – Banten, Bandung, 2006, hlm. 59. Lihat Juga Jimly Asshiddiqie, Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Setelah Perubahan Keempat UUD Tahun 1945, Disampaikan dalam Symposium Nasional yang dilakukan oleh Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Departemen Kehakiman dan HAM, Jakarta, 2003, hlm. 3-4.

Ujang Charda S., PPHI Secara Non Litigasi, Kertas Kerja pada Diskusi Terbatas Bentuk-bentuk Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Subang, Subang, 2006, hlm. 2.

Uwiyono, A. (2017). Mekanisme Penyelesaian Perselisihan Perburuhan Dikaitkan dengan Pola Hubungan Perburuhan. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 22(5), 476-486.

Wijayanti, A. (2014). Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Pasca Reformasi. Sinar Grafika.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12106759

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,