Analisis Putusan Hakim Dalam Gugatan Wanprestasi Perjanjian Utang Piutang Modal Usaha

Viola Farica Azzahra, Johan Ivanicevic, Genthala Rafik Huda, Catherine Rosalina Sianturi, Cristella Zevanya Rhadot Simanjuntak, Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani

Abstract


This study discusses the Analysis of Decision Number 1245/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Sby, highlighting cases of default where the defendant failed to fulfill its achievements as agreed in the agreement. In the context of civil law, this default is a deviation from the obligations agreed upon by both parties. In this case study, the method used is the normative juridical method, which uses a legal perspective based on applicable legal regulations. The Panel of Judges had considerations that supported rejecting the plaintiff's claim. From a civil law perspective, the rejection of this lawsuit shows that in cases of breach of contract, it is important for the plaintiff to formulate the lawsuit clearly and in accordance with the facts presented, as well as ensuring that the petitum requested is consistent with the posita submitted.


Keywords


Analysis, Default, Agreement, Accounts Receivable, Business Capital

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asikin, H. Z., & Sh, S. U. (2019). Hukum acara perdata di Indonesia. Prenada Media.

Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus. (2001). Kompilasi Hukum Perikatan. Jakarta: Citra Aditya

Bakti, Miru, Ahmadi. Sakka, Pati. (2008). Hukum Perikatan dan Penjelasan Makna Pasal 1233 sampai 1456 BW. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Meliala Djaja. (2007). Perkembangan Hukum Perdata Tentang Benda dan Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia.

Muhammad, Abdulkadir. (2006). Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Sumur.

Simanjuntak, P.N.H. (2009). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta.

Djambatan. Subekti. (1992). Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa. Cetakan ke-14.

Subekti. (1979). Hukum Perjanjian, Jakarta: Pembimbing Masa. Cetakan Ke-5. Setiawan, R.. (1999). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perjanjian, Jakarta: Putra Abadin.

Sunggono, B. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Rajagrafindo Persada.

Adati, M. A. (2018). Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian yang Dapat di Pidana Menurut Pasal 378 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Lex Privatum, 6(4), 5–15.

Miftahuddin, A. N., & Karim, K. (2023). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Wanprestasi Perjanjian Utang Piutang. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 175-185. Retrieved from https://journalstih.amsir.ac.id/index.php/julia/article/view/246

Marpaung, J., Lawolo, O., & Siregar, S. (2022). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERBUATAN WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN HUTANG PIUTANG (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 620/PDT.G/2019/PN.MDN). JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 4(1), 555-567. doi:10.46930/jurnalrectum.v4i1.1974

Rizki Utami, E., & HS, S. (2023). WANPRESTASI PERJANJIAN UTANG PIUTANG . Private Law, 3(3), 804-812. https://doi.org/10.29303/prlw.v3i3.3501

Tsania Nurul Azkia, & Arief Suryono. (2024). Analisis Terhadap Ganti Kerugian Akibat Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Utang Piutang (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 59/Pdt.G/2022/PN Mkd). Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(2), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i2.116




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11627498

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,