Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Konkuren Dalam Pembagian Boedel Pailit Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang

Siti Kayla Nadhilah Murod

Abstract


This study aims to examine the position and rights of concurrent creditors in the distribution of the bankruptcy estate and to analyze the forms of legal protection available to them under UUK PKPU. This research employs a normative juridical method with a statutory and literature-based approach. The findings indicate that the position of concurrent creditors during the debt verification process is essentially equal to that of other classes of creditors, but shifts into a residual claim once the bankruptcy estate is distributed, in accordance with the pari passu pro rata parte principle. UUK PKPU further provides preventive legal protection, among others through voting rights in the composition plan and the renvoi procedure for disputed claims, as well as repressive protection through the actio pauliana mechanism. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of such protection in practice remains constrained by limited access to information, procedural costs, and the weak bargaining position of concurrent creditors in composition negotiations, indicating the need for stronger supervision by the supervisory judge and greater professionalism among curators.

Keywords


Bankruptcy Estate, Bankruptcy Law, Concurrent Creditor, Legal Protection.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hadi Shubhan, 2008. Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan, Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Man S. Sastrawidjaja, 2010. Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Bandung: PT Alumni.

Satjipto Rahardjo, 2000. Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini, 2009. Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan, Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Philipus M. Hadjon, 1987. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia, Surabaya: PT Bina Ilmu.

Azarine, C. E., et al. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum atas Kepastian Pembayaran kepada Kreditor Konkuren dalam Kepailitan. Solusi Bersama: Jurnal Pengabdian dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat, 2(2), 80-92.

Adhia, R. Y., et al. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Kurator dalam Sita Boedel Pailit oleh Negara (Kejaksaan) (Kasus PT Aliga International Pratama Nomor 156K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2015). Diponegoro Law Journal, 10(1), 218-234.

Disemadi, H. S., & Gomes, D. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Konkuren dalam Perspektif Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1), 123-134.

Idham, I., et al. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Konkuren dalam Kepailitan: Studi Putusan Nomor 04/Pdt.Sus-PKPU.Pailit/2018/PN.Niaga Mks. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS), 1(5), 746-758.

Kale, G. I., & Dharmakusuma, A. A. G. A. (2015). Syarat Kepailitan sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Debitor dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 1-12.

Suryanti, N., et al. (2025). The Status of Property Granted in the Provisions of Bankruptcy Law in Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 13(1), 38-54.

Widiyaningrum, W., & Erar Joesoef, I. (2024). Application of the Principles of Actio Pauliana Bankruptcy and Legal Protection Against Buyers in Good Faith: Case Study: Decision Number 17/Pdt.G/2019/PN Idm. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(1), 57-74.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23163848

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,