Ketika Legalitas Berhadapan Dengan Moralitas: Analisis Filsafat Hukum Terhadap Kontroversi Promosi Minuman Beralkohol Dengan Simbol Keagamaan

Noer Gita Safira Zaini, Ajeng Prameswari Salamah

Abstract


The controversy surrounding the Qur’an memorization challenge offering alcoholic beverages as prizes at The Sounds Project raises questions concerning the boundaries between legality and morality in commercial activities. This study aims to analyze the controversy from the perspective of moral philosophy and to examine whether the legality of alcohol promotion can serve as a basis for the moral justification of using religious symbols. This research employs a normative legal method with qualitative analysis based on H.L.A. Hart’s theory concerning the relationship between law and morality and Lon L. Fuller’s concept of the internal morality of law. The findings indicate that legality does not automatically constitute moral justification. The use of religious symbols as promotional instruments must take into account propriety, respect for religious values, and social impacts. Therefore, legality does not necessarily imply moral justification, particularly when commercial freedom intersects with religious values and the interests of society.


Keywords


legality, morality, philosophy of law, religious symbols.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Reserse Kriminal Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. (2026, August 18). Dari challenge berhadiah miras, berujung jerat pidana. Pusat Informasi Kriminal Nasional Bareskrim Polri.

Bentham, J. (1907). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Clarendon Press.

Dewan Periklanan Indonesia. (2020). Etika pariwara Indonesia.

Fuller, L. L. (1969). The morality of law. Yale University Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (2012). The concept of law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Kant, I. (1997). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.

Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.

Majelis Ulama Indonesia. (2026). Soal challenge Ad-Dhuha untuk miras, MUI ingatkan sakralitas kitab suci.

Mill, J. S. (2001). Utilitarianism. Hackett Publishing Company.

Peraturan BPK RI. (1999). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.

Peraturan BPK RI. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2002 tentang Penyiaran.

Peraturan BPK RI. (2013). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 74 Tahun 2013 tentang Pengendalian dan Pengawasan Minuman Beralkohol.

Peraturan BPK RI. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 33 Tahun 2014 tentang Jaminan Produk Halal.

Radbruch, G. (2006). Statutory lawlessness and supra-statutory law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11.

Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Harvard University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23093822

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,