Analisis Kebijakan Penghentian Bansos Lansia Akibat Indikasi Judi Online dalam Perspektif Teori Keadilan John Rawls

Rafhael Roberto Silitonga, Muhammad Hafidz Al Ayuda

Abstract


This study examines the driving factors behind living together (cohabitation) among university students and the forms of victimization faced by its actors following the enactment of Article 412 of Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, criminological, and victimological approaches, legal materials were gathered through library research and analyzed qualitatively via a descriptive-analytical method, drawing on Mendelsohn's victim typology, lifestyle theory, and routine activity theory. Results show cohabitation is driven by socio-cultural, economic, psychological, legal-administrative, and educational factors, while actors hold a dual position as potential offenders and victims (self-victimizing behavior) across five forms of victimization: legal, economic, physical-sexual, psychosocial, and indirect victimization of children. Its impact on public order is contextual and provable only through actual violence, neglect, or disturbance. Enforcement of Article 412 should thus be proportional and victim-centered.

Keywords


Elderly Social Assistance, Online Gambling, Rawls’ Theory of Justice, Difference Principle, Procedural Justice, Public Order, Criminal Law

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alwino, A. (2026). Pembacaan kritis Michael Sandel terhadap teori keadilan John Rawls. Melintas, 41(1).

Harahap, M. H. E. S. (2026, September 26). Bansos terindikasi judol, bagaimana cara mengajukan sanggah? ANTARA News.

Helm, D. (2024). Legacy: How to build the sustainable economy. Cambridge University Press.

Hunyadi, M. (1998). Does “real-freedom-for-all” really justify basic income? Swiss Political Science Review, 4(1), 58–59.

Illahi, F., Soleh, A. U., & Taufik, Z. (2026). Konflik tanah masyarakat adat Papua dalam film Pesta Babi perspektif keadilan John Bordley Rawls. Jurnal Dialektika Hukum, 8(1).

Mendrofa, O. (2024). Pembatasan kebebasan beragama berdasarkan teori keadilan dan hak asasi manusia. Milthree Law Journal, 1(1).

Miftachudin. (2026a). Bansos lansia terhenti akibat terindikasi judol, Gubernur Luthfi turun langsung. RRI.co.id.

Miftachudin. (2026b). Terindikasi judi online, lansia di Pekalongan kehilangan bansos padahal tak punya. RRI.co.id.

Mulyana, K. E. (2026, September 1). Kisah bansos lansia buta huruf di Pekalongan dihentikan karena terindikasi judol, ini kata Dinsos. Kompas TV.

Nugroho, W. (2016). Politik hukum pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi atas pelaksanaan pemilu dan pemilukada di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 13(3), 480–502.

Prasetyo, M. R. B. E. (2026, September 2). Kemensos dalami 1,4 juta penyalur bansos terindikasi judol. ANTARA News.

Puspitalaw, I. (2026). Asas keseimbangan dalam hukum perjanjian digital: Telaah teori keadilan kontraktual John Rawls. Jurnal QOSIM: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial & Humaniora, 4(4).

Taylor, R. S. (2011). Reconstructing Rawls: The Kantian foundations of justice as fairness. Pennsylvania State University Press.

Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. (2019). BAB I: Pendahuluan [Disertasi/karya tulis ilmiah]. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.

Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana. (2017). Persamaan dan perbedaan perlakuan hukum dalam perspektif keadilan [Tesis, Bab II]. Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Van Parijs, P. (2002). Difference principles. In S. Freeman (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press.

Wahyudhi, S., & Baihaqi, F. A. (2023). Kontekstualisasi teori keadilan John Rawls pada konstelasi kemasyarakatan di Indonesia. Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, dan Budaya, 6(2).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 1998 tentang Kesejahteraan Lanjut Usia. (1998).

MC Kota Pekanbaru. (2026, September 23). Dinsos Pekanbaru ingatkan penerima bansos tak terlibat pinjol dan judol. InfoPublik.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23031995

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,