Peran Lembaga yang Mendukung Penelusuran Alat Bukti Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang yang Menggunakan Cryptocurrency

Asmara Nova Susanto, Wiwik Afifah

Abstract


The purpose of writing the journal is to analyze the role of law enforcement agencies in tracing money laundering cases using Cryptocurrency. The perpetrators of the crime are trying to find a place to launder money or a place that cannot trace the assets resulting from the crime. Cryptocurrency is a form of asset that is difficult to trace because it has anonymous and decentralized properties. The method of writing this journal uses normative juridical. The results of the study are that handling TPPU using Cryptocurrency in Indonesia requires the role of PPATK, OJK, KPK, BAPPEBTI, Polri, Prosecutor's Office, Financial Action Task Force (FATF), Interpol, and Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs). The crucial role that must be carried out is coordination for tracing crypto assets, knowing the motives for the flow of funds, analyzing transaction patterns, obtaining evidence, and knowing the parties involved. However, the defendant is the one who is asked to prove assets that are not the result of a crime, because in TPPU the evidentiary system uses reverse proof.


Keywords


Money Laundering, Cryptocurrency, institutions, reverse burden of proof

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agus, A. (2022). Pembuktian tindak pidana suap dalam undang-undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Tri Pantang, 7(2), 100-110.

Al Fath. (2023). Peranan dan peningkatan PPATK dalam mendukung upaya pencegahan pencucian uang oleh pejabat di Indonesia (Studi kasus Rafael Alun). Jurnal Hukum Statuta, 3(1), 53–62.

Albrecht, C., Duffin, K. M., Hawkins, S., & Morales Rocha, V. (2019). The use of cryptocurrencies in the money laundering process. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 22(2), 210-216.

Basit, B. (2023). Urgensi perlindungan hukum perusahaan exchanger cryptocurrency terhadap aliran transaksi dari pengguna anonim wallet decentralized exchange. COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(11), 1–15.

Dyntu, V., & Dykyi, O. (2019). Cryptocurrency in the system of money laundering. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(5), 75–81.

Firdaus, S. P. (2023). The urgency of money laundering policy reform for digital Rupiah implementation. AML/CFT Journal: The Journal of Anti Money Laundering and Countering The Financing of Terrorism, 2(1), 58–82.

Flora, H. S., Syah, K., Erwin, E., Laila, S. A. N., & Lawra, R. D. (2024). Comparative analysis of criminal laws on money laundering in ASEAN countries: Between justice and protection. Review UNES, 6(3), 8930.

Haris, B. S. (2024). Added value and challenges of the follow-the-money approach in environmental crimes. AML/CFT Journal: The Journal of Anti Money Laundering and Countering The Financing of Terrorism, 2(2), 111–125.

Ida Ayu Setyawati. (2014). Beban pembuktian terbalik dalam perkara money laundering dengan predicate crime tindak pidana korupsi. Brawijaya Law Student Journal, 1(2).

Karaseran, I. O. (2015). Peran kejaksaan dalam penyidikan dan penuntutan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Lex Crimen, 4(4).

Lasmadi, S., & Sudarti, E. (2021). Pembuktian terbalik pada tindak pidana pencucian uang. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 199-218.

Nelson, F. M., Prosperiani, M. D., Ramadhan, C. R., & Andini, P. P. (2024). Cracking the code: Investigating the hunt for crypto assets in money laundering cases in Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 9(1), 89-130.

Putri, T., Amiludin, A., Ahmad, D. N., & Hidayatulloh, H. (2023). Inadequate cryptocurrency and money laundering regulations in Indonesia (Comparative law of US and Germany). Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 12(1), 1–15.

Rani, D. A. M., Sugiartha, I. N. G., & Karma, N. M. S. (2021). Uang virtual (cryptocurrency) sebagai sarana tindak pidana pencucian uang dalam perdagangan saham. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 2(1), 19–23.

Sembiring, P. E. (2024). Menilai pemberlakuan pembuktian terbalik pada tindak pidana pencucian uang sebagai kejahatan proxy di dalam aset kripto. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(1), 53-64.

Sikumbang, F. S., & Damayanti, S. (2022). Optimalisasi peran Bappebti dalam pengawasan transaksi aset cryptocurrency di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Malikussaleh (JSPM), 3(2), 325-336.

Simoes, J. E., Ferreira, E., Menasche, D. S., & Campos, C. A. V. (2021). Blockchain privacy through merge avoidance and mixing services: A hardness and an impossibility result. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14(5), 2831–2842.

Wattie, A. F. (2015). Peran PPATK dalam penyidikan tindak pidana pencucian uang. Lex Crimen, 4(3).

Wiryadi, U., Gifari, F., & Chariansyah, H. (2024). Kedudukan dan kewenangan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) dalam ketatanegaraan Indonesia pasca undang-undang baru. Begawan Abioso, 14(2), 109–116.

Yanuar, M. A. (2022). Kewenangan penyidik Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dalam menyidik tindak pidana pencucian uang. AML/CFT Journal: The Journal of Anti Money Laundering and Countering The Financing of Terrorism, 1(1), 67–86.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14184847

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,