Peran Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa dalam Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Terhadap Etnis Rohingya di Myanmar: Perspektif Responsibility to Protect Concept

Fatma Putri Fadilah, Moh. Akmal Taris Hakim, Fyo Akbar Putra Frefy, Ridha Wahyuni

Abstract


Responsibility to Protect (R2P) is an international principle that emphasizes the obligation of every country to protect the human rights of its citizens. Although human rights violations against the Rohingya ethnic group in Myanmar are an internal problem, resolving them is still difficult. Further evaluation by the UN is needed to ensure the effectiveness of R2P implementation. The UN implements R2P through the Security Council and Human Rights Council to overcome the humanitarian crisis against the Rohingya ethnic group. The type of research used is literature study by reviewing existing literature related to the written topic. The method used is a qualitative research method with the data source used in the form of secondary data obtained from several national journals, articles and previous research. The result is that we can see that the implementation of R2P in this conflict is still facing difficulties, as shown by the UN Presidential Statement in November 2017. The role of the UN Human Rights Council helps in resolving cases of human rights violations against the Rohingya ethnic group, although the implementation of R2P is difficult in Myanmar's internal conflict with the Rohingya ethnic group.


Keywords


Responsibility to Protect, Rohingya, Human right

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashari, K. (2020). Kamus Hubungan Internasional dan Diplomasi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Bakry, U. S. (2019). Hukum Humaniter International: Sebuah Pengantar. Prenada Media.

Ajawaila, D. P., Matulapelwa, A. H., & Ngongare, S. (2022). Peranan Indonesia Dalam Kasus Etnis Rohingya Berdasarkan Konsep Responsibility to Protect (R2P). JURNAL SAINS SOSIAL DAN HUMANIORA (JSSH), 2(1), 131-136.

Andyanto, I. M. (2021). Penerapan Responsibility to Protect (R2P) oleh Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB) di Libya= The Implementation of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) by the United Nations (UN) in Libya (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pelita Harapan).

Arianta, K., Mangku, DGS, & Yuliartini, NPR (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kaum Etnis Rohingya Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Internasional. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia , 3 (2), 166-176.

Christian Natanael. H. G. (2019). Peran PBB Dalam Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Menurut Kajian Hukum Internasional. Jurnal Lex Et Societatis, 7(9).

Dahl-Eriksen, T. (2024). Sovereignty as Responsibility with References to the Framework of R2P. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs, 12(1), 4.

Dewi O.M. (2018). ANALISIS PENERAPAN RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT (R2P) DALAM PENYELESAIAN KRISIS KEMANUSIAAN DI RAKHINE: STUDI KASUS ROHINGYA (2012-2017).

ERDUR, V. (2021). A Short Review About The Concept of Responsibility to Protect. Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 4(2), 401-410.

Harris, R. F., Nugroho, I. I., & Assabili, F. (2021). Urgensi Penerapan Responsibility to Protect Guna Menangani Pemerkosaan Sistematik Dalam Konflik Bersenjata Internasional. Ikatan Penulis Mahasiswa Hukum Indonesia Law Journal, 1(2), 225-241.

Hasibuan, W. A. (2020). Kompleksitas Penerapan Prinsip Responsible To Protect Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Pembantaian Etnis Rohingya di Myanmar. Lex Jurnalica. 17(2), 148-155.

Idachaba, E. U. (2024). The Responsibility to Protect (RtoP): Norm Institutionalisation, Issues and Challenges. In Africa's Engagement with the Responsibility to Protect in the 21st Century (pp. 379-399). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Mangku, D. G. S. (2021). Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia kepada Etnis Rohingya di Myanmar. Perspektif Hukum, 21(1), 1-15.

Maulana, H.S. (2017). Indonesia dan Responsibility To Protect Etnis Muslim Rohingnya Myanmar. Jurnal Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan, 2(2).

Norilla; Mulyono, Eddy. (2018). Responsibility to Protect sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia di ASEAN. Lentera Hukum, 5(1), 7-30.

Rameliah, D.R., & Sagena, U. W. (2023). Krisis Keamanan Manusia di Myanmar dan Penerapan Konsep Responsibility to Protect. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 7(3), 27979-27986.

Salim, S.F., & Azaria, D. P. (2023). Analisis Ius Constituendum Penegakan Hukum Kejahatan Genosida Pada Kasus Rohingya: Refleksi Atas Kasus Holocaust. In National Conference on Law Studies (NCOLS), 5(1), 244-261.

Setiawan, I. P., & Suryanti, M. S. D. (2021). Keterlibatan Asean dalam Menangani Konflik Myanmar (Studi Kasus: Konflik Etnis Rohingya 2017–2019). POLITICOS: Jurnal Politik Dan Pemerintahan, 1(2), 83-97.

Setiyani, S., & Setiyono, J. (2020). Penerapan Prinsip Pertanggungjawaban Negara Terhadap Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Etnis Rohingya Di Myanmar. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 2(2), 261-274.

Thuzar, M. (2023). Myanmar and the Responsibility to Protect: Principles, Precedents, and Practicalities. Journal of International Peacekeeping, 26(2-3), 189-211.

Utama, I. G. A. A., Mangku, D. G. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2020). Yurisdiksi International Criminal Court (ICC) Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Rohingnya Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 3(3), 208-219.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11663887

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,