Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Mengalami Amnesia Karena Trauma Berat Menurut Pasal 44 Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1946 Tentang Kitab Hukum Pidana

Seza Aulia Gusti Kurnia

Abstract


This study examines the criminal liability of perpetrators of serious assault who experience amnesia as a result of depression triggered by severe trauma. The method used is normative juridical, with a statutory and conceptual approach. The study focuses on the application of Article 44 of the Criminal Code No. 1 of 1946, criminal responsibility theory, and expert doctrine. Furthermore, this research integrates clinical psychology and psychiatric perspectives in understanding amnesia and depression to assess their impact on the perpetrator's capacity to be accountable for their actions. The results indicate that amnesia resulting from depression and severe trauma does not automatically negate the ability to be criminally responsible, unless it can be proven that the disorder caused the perpetrator to be unable to understand or control their actions at the time of the crime. Therefore, the application of Article 44 of the Criminal Code in cases of serious assault with amnesia requires a comprehensive medical and legal assessment to ensure that the verdict reflects substantive justice.

Keywords


criminal liability, amnesia, depression, severe trauma, Article 44 of the Criminal Code

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anthoni Y. Oratmangun. “Kajian Hukum Terhadap Kemampuan Bertanggung Jawab Menurut Pasal 44 Kuhp” Iv, No. 5 (2016): 178–85.

Dr. Agus Rusianto, S.H., M.H. Tindak Pidana & Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tinjauan Kritis Melalui Konsistensi Antara Asas, Teori, Dan Penerapannya Edisi Pertama. Pertama. Kencana (Prenadamedia Group), 2016.

Firmansyah, Yohanes, Hukum Kesehatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional, Veteran Jakarta, Gunawan Widjaja, Hukum Kesehatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional, And Veteran Jakarta. “Masalah-Masalah Dalam Kesehatan Jiwa” 5, No. 1 (2022): 474–502.

Ida, Orintina Vavinta, And Nany Suryawati. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dengan Gangguan Kejiwaan Menurut Ketentuan Hukum Positif” 12 (2023): 263–75. Https://Doi.Org/10.37893/Jbh.V12i2.620.

Jambi, Universitas. “Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia” 02, No. 02 (2022): 141–53.

Kusnaini. “Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Asas Geen Straf Zonders Chuld Menjadi Landasan Fundamental Bahwa Seseorang Hanya Dapat Dipidana Apabila Memiliki Kesalahan. Kesalahan Tersebut Harus Lahir Dari Kemampuan Pelaku Untuk Memahami Makna Perbuatannya (Kemampuan Be,” 2024.

Lukman Hakim. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Grup Penerbitan Cv Budi Utama, 2020.

Rahmanuddin Tomalili. Hukum Pidana. Grup Penerbitan Cv Budi Utama, 2019.

Wulandari, Apriani, Aulia Razanah, Avisha Nur Abidah, And Tugimin Supriyadi. “Perspektif Kriminologis Terhadap Gangguan Identitas Disosiatif Sebagai Faktor Pemicu Tindak Pidana” 2, No. June (2025): 1–14.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17975314

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,