Reformulasi Pertanggungjawaban Negara terhadap Kerusakan Lingkungan Lintas Batas dalam Perspektif Ekologi Hukum

Muhammad Wildan Mufti

Abstract


Transboundary environmental harm presents a serious challenge in international law because activities conducted by one state may cause significant ecological impacts on another. The current doctrine of state responsibility remains inadequate, primarily due to the dominance of state sovereignty, difficulties in proving causation, weak due diligence standards, and the absence of binding sanctions or ecological restoration mechanisms. This study analyzes these shortcomings and proposes a more ecologically responsive reformulation model through an ecocentric approach and ecological jurisprudence perspective. The proposed reform strengthens the principles of prevention, ecological restoration obligations, cross-border transparency, and more robust enforcement mechanisms. Thus, state responsibility becomes not only compensatory but also oriented toward ecosystem protection and intergenerational justice as the foundation for sustainable global environmental governance.

Keywords


Responsibility, Environment, Transboundary, Ecology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmadi, S. (2013). Prinsip non-interference asean dan problem efektivitas asean agreement on transboundary haze pollution. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 1(2), 187-195.

Bhatia. V. Legal Service India. “International Environmental Law and Transboundary Environmental Harm”. https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-18990-international-environmental-law-and-transboundary-environmental-harm.html.

Cullinan, C. (2011). Wild law: A manifesto for earth justice. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Gunawan, Y. (2014). Transboundary Haze Pollution in the Perspective of International Law of State Responsibility. Jurnal Media Hukum, 21(2), 11-11.

Jayakumar, S., Koh, T., Beckman, R., & Phan, H. D. (Eds.). (2015). Transboundary pollution: evolving issues of international law and policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Pebrianto, D. Y., Putra, A. K., & Ardianto, B. (2024). Conception of The Precautionary Principle in International Environmental Law: Ecosystem or Humanity?. Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law, 5(3), 569-606.

Pratama, R. I. B., Susianto, S., & Miladiyanto, S. (2016). Tinjauan Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Negara Terhadap Pencemaran Polusi Udara Transnasional Pasca Peratifikasian Aathp (Asean Agreement Transboundary Haze Polution). Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 1(1), 43-56.

Press, U. G. M. (2024). Sosiologi LIngkungan Hidup. UGM PRESS.

Schmalenbach, K. (2023). States responsibility and liability for Transboundary environmental harm. Dalam Corporate Liability for Transboundary Environmental Harm, 43-84.

Tethool, A. C., & Kainama, M. Pencemaran Udara Lintas Batas Negara: Memahami Tanggungjawab Negara Menurut Deklarasi Rio.

Viaene, L. (2022). Can rights of nature save us from the anthropocene catastrophe? Some critical reflections from the field. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 9(2), 187-206.

Yo’el, S. M. (2018). Implementasi Perjanjian Internasional di Asean; Praktik di Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Singapura dalam Melaksanakan Asean Agreement on Transboundary Haze Polution. VOICE JUSTISIA: Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 2(1), 63-91.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17817357

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,