Harmonisasi Hukum Adat dan Hukum Positif dalam Pembagian Harta Perkawinan Antarsuku: Studi Kasus Sistem Patrilineal Batak dan Matrilineal Minangkabau
Abstract
In the context of Indonesia’s legal system, positive law, customary law, and religious law interact and often overlap in various aspects of social life. Customary law, including the patrilineal system of the Batak community and the matrilineal system of the Minangkabau community, dynamically interacts with positive law. This article employs a normative juridical approach to examine the differences in the principles governing marital property distribution under Batak (patrilineal) and Minangkabau (matrilineal) customary systems, as well as efforts to harmonize them with Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage. The findings indicate that, in Batak customary law, marital property generally belongs to the husband or the husband’s family based on patrilineal inheritance traditions. Meanwhile, Minangkabau customary law distinguishes between jointly acquired property (gono-gini) and individual inherited property, where the former is managed jointly and the latter remains the right of each spouse. Marriage Law 35-37 provide a framework for classifying assets (joint, separate, and acquired property), and Marriage Law 37 affirms that the division of joint property shall follow “the respective laws†of the parties, whether religious or customary. However, the absence of an implementing government regulation (as mandated by Marriage Law 67 No. 1/1974) and cultural diversity often lead to inconsistencies between customary and positive law. This article recommends a harmonization approach based on legal pluralism, recognizing and respecting customary rights insofar as they do not conflict with constitutional and human rights principles.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Maria S.W.Sumardjono,(2008). Pendekatan metode kualitatif yuridis - sosiologis praktik hukum adat Batak (patrilineal) dan Minangkabau (matrilineal)
Divani ‘Aina Nurlita dkk. “Perkawinan dalam Perspektif Hukum Adat Indonesia: Ragam Sistem, Tradisi, dan Tantangan Modern.†Jurnal Legal Society and Law 3, no.2 (2025): 87-106journal.staitaruna.ac.idjournal.staitaruna.ac.id.
Judiasih, Sonny Dewi. Harta Benda Perkawinan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015.
Pradhani, Sartika Intaning. “Pendekatan Pluralisme Hukum dalam Studi Hukum Adat: Interaksi Hukum Adat dengan Hukum Nasional dan Internasional.†Undang: Jurnal Hukum 4, no.1 (2021): 81–124ujh.unja.ac.id.
Sihotang, Amri Panahatan. Hukum Adat Indonesia: Struktur dan Dinamika. Semarang: Univ. Semarang Press, 2023.
Swislyn, Verlyta; Narsudin; Nurwidiatmo. “Pembagian Harta Bersama dalam Perceraian Suku Batak Toba yang Menganut Kepercayaan Parmalim.†Jurnal Nuansa Kenotariatan 4, no.1 (2018): 33–44media.neliti.commedia.neliti.com.
UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Lembaran Negara RI No. 3019. Pasal 35–37.
Wulandari, Erlyana. “Implementasi Aturan Adat Tentang Harta Suarang Setelah Perceraian di Nagari Batu Balang.†Skripsi, IAIN Batusangkar, 2020repo.uinmybatusangkar.ac.id.
Zainal Abidin. Status Harta Gono-gini dari Perceraian: Perspektif UU No.1/1974 dan KHI. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada Press, 2017.
M.K. Siahaan. (2002). Sistem perkawinan keberagaman suku dan adat menghadiri tantangan.
Soepomo. (2007) Perkawinan dan komplikasi Hukum Islam.
A.A. Nafis (1984) matriliar garis keturunan ibu suku Minangkabau
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17663384
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Â



