Gugatan Pembatalan Merek Sebagai Upaya Hukum Memerangi Fenomena Trademark Bullying yang didasari oleh Penggunaan Merek dengan Kata Umum

Dinda Amelia Suwandi

Abstract


The phenomenon of trademark bullying occurs when trademark owners excessively exercise their rights to pressure other parties, particularly in cases involving marks that use common words or lack distinctiveness. Weak distinctiveness parameters in the first-to-file system allow generic marks to remain registered and potentially be misused, as seen in the Campus/Kampus vs. Distinction case. This normative juridical research shows that the use of common words in trademarks is a primary trigger of intimidation, as trademark owners can claim a monopoly over terms that should be freely available for public use. Decision Number 25 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2014, which annulled the “Campus/Kampus†trademark, demonstrates that trademark cancellation lawsuits are an effective means to counter trademark bullying. These findings highlight the need to tighten substantive examination, enforce the principle of good faith, and strengthen restrictions on the use of common terms in trademark registration.


Keywords


trademark bullying, common words, distinctiveness, trademark cancellation, good faith.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Fetrya Salsabilla Hanjani, Miranda Risang Ayu Palar, & Helitha Novianty Muchtar. (2024). Penggunaan Kata Umum Dalam Pendaftaran Merek Pada Sengketa Merek STRONG Antara Hardwood Private Limited Dengan PT. Unilever Indonesia, Tbk. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis. Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik.

Kholika, R. R. (2024). ANALISA YURIDIS ASPEK ITIKAD BAIK SEBAGAI DASAR PEMBATALAN MEREK MENURUT UU NO 20 TAHUN 2016 (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 49 PK/PDT. SUS-HKI/2018). Journal Equitable, 9(2).

Lindsey, Tim, et al., eds. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual, Suatu Pengantar Edisi Kedua. Penerbit Alumni, 2022.

Quynh La . Bully No More: Why Trademark Owners Engage in Trademark Overreach and How to Prevent It. Wash. L. Rev. 2021.

Rahmi Jened. Hukum merek (trademark law): dalam era global dan integrasi ekonomi. Prenadamedia Group, 2015.

Ranti Fauza Mayana.(2004), Perlindungan Desain Industri di Indonesia dalam Era Perdagangan Bebas. Grasindo, Jakarta,

Rika Ratna Permata, dkk. Teori dan praktik: Trademark bullying di Indonesia. Cet. ke-1. Bandung, Refika aditama, 2025,

Sanjaya, A. H., & Silalahi, W. (2025). Pembatasan Hak Ekslusif terhadap Penggunaan Kata Umum dalam Sebuah Merek. Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2),

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamuji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2003

Sudaryat, Sudjana, and Rika Ratna Permata. "Hak Kekayaan Intelektual." Bandung: Oase Media (2010).

Suyud Margono dan Amir Angkasa. Komersialisasi aset intelektual aspek hukum bisnis. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia, 2002,

Yuliana Utama, et.al. Pelindungan Merek Berbasis Tingkat Daya Pembeda Ditinjau Dari Doktrin Dilusi Merek Di Indonesia. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 5(1), 2021.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17637450

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,