Pembatalan SK Pemberhentian Tidak Hormat Notaris oleh Pengadilan Akibat Kesalahan Kementerian Hukum dan HAM (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 294 K/TUN/2021)

Reynaldi Yuliansyah Nasution, Tetti Somasir

Abstract


Notaries in carrying out their authority and duties are regulated by Law Number 2 of 2014. A notary can be dismissed by the Minister of Law and Human Rights if they commit a serious violation. A notary can file an objection and a cancellation lawsuit against the Dishonorary Dismissal Decree issued by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights as stated in the Jakarta State Administrative Court Decision Number 294 K/TUN/2021. Where the court subsequently revoked and annulled the Decree of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number AHU.55.AH.02.04 of 2019. The issue in this research is to determine the accountability of the Minister of Law and Human Rights and to understand how to restore the reputation of notaries who have been harmed by the dishonorable dismissal by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights from the Notary position based on the annulment of the decree by the court as stated in decision Number 294 K/TUN/2021. Meanwhile, the research method used in this study is normative juridical, which employs secondary legal data and qualitative data analysis. And the theories used to analyze the issues in this research are Hans Kelsen's Theory of Responsibility, Philipus M. Hadjon's Theory of Legal Protection, and the general principles of good governance. The results of the research and discussion, as well as the conclusion, indicate that the decision of the Minister of Law and Human Rights has not met the principle of prudence based on the Judge's consideration, and it is the Minister's responsibility to revoke the decision that has been made and restore the Notary's status by reappointing them as a Notary in their original place as one of the efforts to restore the Notary's good name.

Keywords


Notary, Dismissal Without Honor, Restoration of Good Name.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Notodisoerjo dan Soegondo. R, Hukum Notariat di Indonesia Suatu Penjelasan, (Jakarta: Rajawali 1999), hlm.13.

Komar Andasasmita, Notaris I, (Bandung: Sumur Bandung, 1981), hlm.45.

Habib Adjie, Hukum Notaris Indonesia (Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris, (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2008), hlm. 40.

Abdulkadir Muhammad, Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Cet. 1. (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti 2004), hlm. 52.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamuji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Raja Grafindu Persada, Jakarta, 2001, hlm. 13.

Roni Hanitjo Soemitro, 1982, Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, hlm. 20.

Roni Hanitjo Soemitro, 1982, Metodelogi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta, hlm. 20. M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006), hlm. 69-70.

Rahmad Hendra,”Tanggung jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta autentik Yang Penghadapnya Mepergunakan Identitas Palsu di Kota Pekan Baru”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1,Vol. 3 No. 1, (2012). Di akses pada tanggal 02 februari 2024


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 


Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)

E-ISSN :3032-6591

Organized by Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane,